CODESYS - the IEC 61131-3 automation software

Welcome to the official CODESYS Forum by 3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH | A member of the CODESYS Group
Deutsche Version English version russian version 
It is currently Fri Dec 13, 2019 4:32 pm

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 07, 2019 11:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2019 7:26 am
Posts: 1
I have a project (originally developed in Schneider Electric SoMachine) that's an archive created in Schnieder Electric's Machine Expert. It was opened and compiled in CODESYS in order to run Static Analysis (SA). It appears that SA0162 (Missing comments) is reported for some of the DUTs (ENUM) but not for other, while all DUTs are missing comments.

I have noticed that if a non-reported DUT (ENUM) is copied and pasted, SA will report SA0162 (Missing comments) on the pasted DUT, and sometimes also the original will be reported even though nothing was changed there.

[UPDATE:]
If the original DUT is removed and the copy renamed to the same as the original, the problem reappears, i.e. SA0162 is not reported any more when it should be.

This inconsistency seems to be a bug. Can it be the case?

What is the procedure to report a bug in SA?

Software used:
CODESYS V3.5 SP15 Patch 1 + (64 bit)
CODESYS Static Analysis 4.2.4.0
Schneider Electric Machine Expert 1.1


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited